1.   Closed

    Action Leads Solutions | Virginia College Online | NEW BUILD

    by Amanda Frisone on November 4, 2015

    • Ticket #3524
    • Status
    • Priority
    • Milestone
    • Category
    • Tag
    • Assigned to John
    • Last Updated 1:15 pm
    • Modified by John

    [vgno]

  2. Amanda Frisone
    about 11 years ago

    11/4 – Basic Validation complete in LX.COM and LX.NET [vgno]. We ran this in the past. Please update backend and landing page.
    Highlighted fields in FPIs need updating and so do the programs

    1. Status changed from New to In Progress.
    2. Assignment John added.
  3. John
    about 11 years ago

    1. Status changed from In Progress to New.
  4. Amanda Frisone
    about 11 years ago

    11/10 – Client checking on status.

    1. Assignment amanda removed.
  5. John Ramirez
    about 11 years ago

    Custom validation modifications have been completed on LX.COM & LX.NET. Will have to push a test lead.

    Will update with lead test status.

    TCD LP is still pending.

  6. John Ramirez
    about 11 years ago

    Sent a test lead and rejected without a detailed response so I’m wondering:

    Is the posting URL the same? (http://partners.actionleadsolutions.com/processor)

    Or did the ‘accepted’/’RejectionCode’ response codes changed as well?

    Can you see the lead in: http://partners.actionleadsolutions.com/user/login?

    ——————————————

    firstname=test&lastname=Test&addr1=633 Monroe Place&addr2=Apt 4B&ct=Greenville&stateprovince=SC&zipcode=29617&primary_phone=8035842185&wtel=8035842185&ctel=8035842185&email=ram001@gmail.com&educationlevel=Some Graduate Credit&program_id=Accounting Specialist&gradyear=2012&startclasses=4 – 6 months&militaryaffiliation=No Affiliation&contact_permission=Yes&school_id=3250&source_id=73&userip=100.37.73.234&publisher_id=&universal_leadid=&previous_colleges=1&tracking_id=&offer_id=

  7. John Ramirez
    about 11 years ago

    Posted fictitious test lead. It went through but it did not qualify as a good lead because we’re not sending a unique leadid. Under normal circumstances a unique and fully valid leadID would be sent by the vendor when they are live. Let me know if the client confirms receiving this test lead despite the fact that the fake LeadID data was intentionally sent.

    See response below:

    POSTING URL
    ————————
    http://services.leadjet.com/lead/submit

    POSTING STRING
    —————————-
    firstname=test&lastname=Test&addr1=633 Monroe Place&addr2=Apt 4B&ct=Greenville&stateprovince=SC&zipcode=29617&primary_phone=8035842184&wtel=8035842184&ctel=8035842185&email=ram002@gmail.com&educationlevel=3&program_id=27384&gradyear=2012&startclasses=4 – 6 months&militaryaffiliation=0&contact_permission=1&school_id=3250&source_id=73&userip=100.37.73.234&publisher_id=&universal_leadid=1627180&previous_colleges=1&tracking_id=&offer_id=

    SERVER RESPONSE: LeadiD determined to be fraudulent (fake)
    —————————-


    17060967
    1

    6
    fraud
    LeadiD determined to be fraudulent (fake)


    rejected
    unqualified
    fraud
    LeadiD determined to be fraudulent (fake)

  8. Amanda Frisone
    about 11 years ago

    11/24 – sent URL to client to review
    ====
    test leads were approved

  9. Amanda Frisone
    about 11 years ago

    APPROVED – Please make live on TCD

  10. John Ramirez
    about 11 years ago

    Landing page is live on TCD.

    1. Status changed from New to Closed.